Attached again - didn't upload properly the first time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Virtual camera club for grumpy gits who don't like the type of people who usually go to camera clubs.
Posts
Labels
- 16mm (2)
- 2009 (1)
- admin (6)
- advice (9)
- alamy (1)
- autumn (13)
- Best of (1)
- bigcats (1)
- black and white (3)
- camera news (4)
- canon_v_nikon_jihad (1)
- cardiff wales architecture (3)
- challenge01 (11)
- challenge02 (5)
- challenge03 (10)
- challenge04 (7)
- challenge05 (5)
- challenge06 (5)
- challenge07 (2)
- challenge08 (3)
- challenge09 (3)
- challenge10 (5)
- challenge11 (2)
- challenge12 (3)
- challenges (36)
- christmas (13)
- closeup (2)
- dance (1)
- Dicking about (1)
- difficult lighting (4)
- dpreview (1)
- equipment (10)
- equipment printing (1)
- etiquette (4)
- expensive toys (1)
- fireworks (1)
- flash (3)
- hdr (2)
- high dynamic range (2)
- high key (1)
- hosting (1)
- I am an idiot (1)
- insects (2)
- interval (1)
- kevin's flights of fancy (1)
- landscape (5)
- leaf (3)
- links (1)
- long exposure (5)
- lx5 (3)
- macro (1)
- mft (1)
- mini challenge 01 (2)
- mistakes idiotic photography (1)
- mobile phone camera (3)
- movement (2)
- movie (1)
- nerdery (8)
- night photography (8)
- nikon capture nx (1)
- olympus (1)
- online services (2)
- OT (1)
- panasonic (2)
- party (1)
- photo appreciation (1)
- photoshop (5)
- pitiful earning potential (4)
- portrait (12)
- post processing (7)
- printing (3)
- rain (3)
- reflection (1)
- retouching (8)
- rules (2)
- shallow DOF (2)
- silly (2)
- stock (4)
- sunset (1)
- time lapse (1)
- tom's challenges (1)
- tripod (9)
- weather (2)
- wedding (6)
- zoom (1)
3 comments:
I could see it the first time. Nice shot - certainly better than anything I've spotted for this challenge! Just the sort of thing I was imagining...nice, not contrived, natural capture of real life which tells a story.
Yeah, agree, it's got something. Not contrived at all. I can't quite work it out though.
I think that having to explain that it is Woolies takes something away. I think I'd like to see the store name - or better, the absence of the store name?
Kev - you're right about the Woolies sign. It was there - with even one letter missing for extra poignancy - until about a month ago. How inconsiderate of the people who emptied the store!
Post a Comment